[-] File: image.jpg (256 KB, 800x600)
BREAKING: New 2024 Document ReleaseAnon_Researcher02/02/26(Mon)13:30:41No.86331153[Reply]
Just got access to the latest batch of unsealed documents. Over 170 names mentioned.
Key findings so far:
>Multiple references to visits between 1999-2005
>Financial transactions documented
>Communications logs included
Will be posting excerpts as I go through them.
Key findings so far:
>Multiple references to visits between 1999-2005
>Financial transactions documented
>Communications logs included
Will be posting excerpts as I go through them.
>>
Anon102/02/26(Mon)13:40:41No.61936712▶
>>OP
This is massive. Can you post the document IDs?
This is massive. Can you post the document IDs?
>>
Anon_Researcher02/02/26(Mon)13:50:41No.69067541▶
Document batch #458-C through #512-A
>Contains communications from 2001-2003
>Multiple references noted
The patterns are clear.
>Contains communications from 2001-2003
>Multiple references noted
The patterns are clear.
>>
TruthSeeker02/02/26(Mon)14:00:41No.79496807▶
Following this case for years. Finally disclosure.
>>
DocReader102/02/26(Mon)14:15:10No.82275337▶
This document release is unprecedented. Finally some transparency.
>>
Curious102/02/26(Mon)14:25:10No.97876962▶
>170 names mentioned
How many were already known vs new names?
How many were already known vs new names?
>>
DataAnon02/02/26(Mon)14:30:41No.84020517▶
>Multiple references to visits
This matches the flight logs. Cross-referencing now.
This matches the flight logs. Cross-referencing now.
>>
CrossRef02/02/26(Mon)14:35:10No.88932531▶
Cross-referencing with the flight logs now. Several matches already.
>>
PageTurner02/02/26(Mon)14:45:10No.22090343▶
Page 23 has some interesting financial details.
>>
DocReader02/02/26(Mon)14:45:41No.55534818▶
Page 47 mentions a specific event in 2002.
>>
Redacted102/02/26(Mon)14:55:10No.31531771▶
The redactions on page 45-50 are suspicious. What are they hiding?
>>
Timeline102/02/26(Mon)15:05:10No.05233186▶
File: image.jpg (128 KB)
Anyone else notice the dates cluster around specific events?
>>
Confirmer102/02/26(Mon)15:15:10No.22580089▶
>dates cluster around specific events
Yes, particularly 2001-2003 seems very active.
Yes, particularly 2001-2003 seems very active.
>>
ArchiveAnon02/02/26(Mon)15:15:41No.33695690▶
Archiving everything.
>>
Archivist02/02/26(Mon)15:25:10No.55213608▶
Saving everything to archive. This needs to be preserved.
>>
WitnessWatch02/02/26(Mon)15:35:10No.54873593▶
The witness list alone is damning.
>>
Summary102/02/26(Mon)15:45:10No.51676554▶
Can someone compile a summary of key findings?